If she and I were talking, though, the first thing she’d want to know is how this book fit into the first-person journey of my life. Then I’d find myself quickly formatted into her production as a signifying woman of one sort or another. This is her real legacy. After Oprah, what first-person iteration is not a commodity?

Actually, the first thing she may want to know is why you spout this pseudo-intellectual, nonsensical bullshit that I don’t doubt makes you think you are smart. Can anyone give me a translation of what this claptrap is supposed to mean?

I got lost around the third or fourth question and gave up trying to read it, let alone figure out what the hell she was talking about.

I’m sure it makes sense to HER but, somehow, I do not think those words mean what she thinks they mean.

It means you can write your dissertation about ANYthing, as long as it’s 100 pages long and includes the words “hegemony” and “jouissance.”

I truly pity whoever had to read said dissertation. Assuming they didn’t just give up after the first paragraph.