Log In Register About Fat Jerry Submit Search Members
Fat Jerry
 
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 posted by *hydrated® in Green Reaping-Grimly

{author}'s avatar
Posted by Spazmo
02/25 08:42 AM

I want that.



{author}'s avatar
Posted by *hydrated®
02/25 08:47 AM

It does sound kool…



{author}'s avatar
Posted by gloveshot
02/25 10:26 AM
It does sound kool…

Cooler than a rendering plant?



{author}'s avatar
Posted by XbishopX
02/25 11:22 AM

I could go for this. As long as I’m dead first.



{author}'s avatar
Posted by Moira
02/25 04:45 PM

Okay, so I get that it’s not burning fillings, putting mercury into the air but it sounds like the mercury-laden fillings are now turned into dust and end up in the groundwater. No difference there.

Other than that one nit-pick, it sounds cool! (erm, pun NOT intended.)



{author}'s avatar
Posted by Cy Guy
02/25 09:57 PM

I think the metal pieces wouldn’t shatter and could be sifted out for recycling.

One thing the article seems to exaggerate is the reduction in CO2, while there is a savings in any CO2 generated by the fuel used for cremation, this is partially offset by the energy used to create the liquid Nitrogen.  And any CO2 emitted during decay will still be released as the ‘dust’ eventually decays.  Though I guess their could be difference in the amount of CO2 versus methane released from a standard burial.  Methane has four times the greenhouse effect as CO2, so I guess if that were to be the case it could be somewhat significant.



Page 1 of 1 pages

Back to Fat Jerry home page

You must be a registered member and logged in to post a comment

Register

Log in


Home